Science, Tech, Math › Social Sciences Ban Chiang - Bronze Age Village and Cemetery in Thailand Chronological Debate at Thailand's Bronze Age Village and Cemetery Share Flipboard Email Print Ban Chiang Vessel with Spiral Decorations (Middle Ban Chiang). Ashley Van Haeften Social Sciences Archaeology Ancient Civilizations Basics Excavations History of Animal and Plant Domestication Psychology Sociology Economics Environment Ergonomics Maritime by K. Kris Hirst K. Kris Hirst is an archaeologist with 30 years of field experience. Her work has appeared in scholarly publications such as Archaeology Online and Science. Updated November 04, 2019 Ban Chiang is an important Bronze Age village and cemetery site, located at the confluence of three small tributary streams in Udon Thani province, northeastern Thailand. The site is one of the largest prehistoric Bronze Age sites in this part of Thailand, measuring at least 8 hectares (20 acres) in size. Excavated in the 1970s, Ban Chiang was one of the first extensive excavations in southeast Asia and among the earliest multi-disciplinary efforts in archaeology, with experts in many fields cooperating to produce a fully realized picture of the site. As a result, Ban Chiang's complexity, with a fully-developed Bronze Age metallurgy but lacking the weaponry so often associated with it in Europe and the rest of the world, was a revelation. Living in Ban Chiang Like many long-occupied cities of the world, the present day town of Ban Chiang is a tell: it was built on top of the cemetery and older village remains; cultural remains have been found in some places as deep at 13 feet (4 meters) below the modern day surface. Because of the relatively continuous occupation of the site for perhaps as long as 4,000 years, the evolution of the premetal to Bronze to Iron Age can be traced. Artifacts include distinctive highly varied ceramics known as the "Ban Chiang Ceramic Tradition." Decorative techniques found on pottery at Ban Chiang include black incised and red painted on buff colorations; cord-wrapped paddle, S-shaped curves and swirling incisions motifs; and pedestaled, globular, and carinated vessels, to name just a few of the variations. Also included among the artifact assemblages are iron and bronze jewelry and implements, and glass, shell, and stone objects. With some of the children's burials were found some intricately carved baked clay rollers, which purpose nobody at the moment knows. Debating the Chronology The central debate at the core of Ban Chiang research concerns the dates of occupation and their implications about the onset and cause of the Bronze Age in southeast Asia. Two main competing theories about the timing of the southeast Asian Bronze Age are called the Short Chronology Model (abbreviated SCM and based originally on excavations at Ban Non Wat) and the Long Chronology Model (LCM, based on excavations at Ban Chiang), a reference to the length of period noted by the original excavators compared to that of elsewhere in southeast Asia. Periods / Layers Age LCM SCM Late Period (LP) X, IX Iron 300 BC-AD 200 Middle Period (MP) VI-VIII Iron 900-300 BC 3rd-4th c BC Early Period Upper (EP) V Bronze 1700-900 BC 8th-7th c BC Early Period Lower (EP) I-IV Neolithic 2100-1700 BC 13th-11th c BC Initial Period ca 2100 BC Sources: White 2008 (LCM); Higham, Douka and Higham 2015 (SCM) The main differences between the short and long chronologies stem from a result of different sources for radiocarbon dates. LCM is based on organic temper (rice particles) in clay vessels; SCM dates are based on human bone collagen and shell: all are to a degree problematic. The main theoretical difference, however, is the route by which northeastern Thailand received copper and bronze metallurgy. Short proponents argue that northern Thailand was populated by a migration of southern Chinese Neolithic populations into mainland southeast Asia; Long proponents argue that the southeast Asian metallurgy was stimulated by trade and exchange with mainland China. These theories are bolstered with discussion of the timing for specific bronze casting in the region, established in the Shang Dynasty perhaps as early as the Erlitou period. Also part of the discussion is how the Neolithic/Bronze age societies were organized: were the advances seen in Ban Chiang driven by elites migrating in from China, or were they propelled by a native, non-hierarchical system (heterarchy)? The most recent discussion on these and related issues was published in the journal Antiquity in Autumn 2015. Archaeology at Ban Chiang Legend has it that Ban Chiang was discovered by a clumsy American college student, who fell in the road of the present town of Ban Chiang, and found ceramics eroding out of the road bed. The first excavations at the site were conducted in 1967 by archaeologist Vidya Intakosai, and subsequent excavations were conducted in the mid-1970s by the Fine Arts Department in Bangkok and the University of Pennsylvania under the direction of Chester F. Gorman and Pisit Charoenwongsa. Sources For information on on-going investigations at Ban Chiang, see the Ban Chiang Project webpage at the Institute for Southeast Asian Archaeology at Pennsylvania State. Bellwood P. 2015. Ban Non Wat: crucial research, but is it too soon for certainty? Antiquity 89(347):1224-1226. Higham C, Higham T, Ciarla R, Douka K, Kijngam A, and Rispoli F. 2011. The Origins of the Bronze Age of Southeast Asia. Journal of World Prehistory 24(4):227-274. Higham C, Higham T, and Kijngam A. 2011. Cutting a Gordian Knot: the Bronze Age of Southeast Asia: origins, timing and impact. Antiquity 85(328):583-598. Higham CFW. 2015. Debating a great site: Ban Non Wat and the wider prehistory of Southeast Asia. Antiquity 89(347):1211-1220. Higham CFW, Douka K, and Higham TFG. 2015. A New Chronology for the Bronze Age of Northeastern Thailand and Its Implications for Southeast Asian Prehistory. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0137542. King CL, Bentley RA, Tayles N, Viðarsdóttir US, Nowell G, and Macpherson CG. 2013. Moving peoples, changing diets: isotopic differences highlight migration and subsistence changes in the Upper Mun River Valley, Thailand. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(4):1681-1688. Oxenham MF. 2015. Mainland Southeast Asia: towards a new theoretical approach. Antiquity 89(347):1221-1223. Pietrusewsky M, and Douglas MT. 2001. Intensification of Agriculture at Ban Chiang: Is There Evidence from the Skeletons? Asian Perspectives 40(2):157-178. Pryce TO. 2015. Ban Non Wat: mainland Southeast Asian chronological anchor and waypoint for future prehistoric research. Antiquity 89(347):1227-1229. White J. 2015. Comment on ‘Debating a great site: Ban Non Wat and the wider prehistory of Southeast Asia’. Antiquity 89(347):1230-1232. White JC. 2008. Dating early Bronze at Ban Chiang, Thailand. EurASEAA 2006. White JC, and Eyre CO. 2010. Residential Burial and the Metal Age of Thailand. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 20(1):59-78. White JC, and Hamilton EG. 2014. The Transmission of Early Bronze Technology to Thailand: New Perspectives. In: Roberts BW, and Thornton CP, editors. Archaeometallurgy in Global Perspective: Springer New York. p 805-852. Continue Reading All About Bronze Age Drums, Fishing and Hunting in Vietnam Why Don't Scholars Agree on the Dates for Egyptian Pharaoh Reigns? Was the Temple at Lefkandi Dedicated to a Greek Dark Age Hero? Bronze Age Greece Why Is India Looking East and What Does This Policy Do? What Did the Dong Son Drum Mean to the People Who Created Them? Who Gets the Credit for Taming the Wild Jungle Fowl? Angkor Civilization Timeline - Timeline and King List of the Khmer Empire What Scientists Learned from 3,500 Year Old Oracle Bones at Anyang Is Ancient Faience Egypt's Answer to Costume Jewelry? Hierakonpolis - City at the Start of Egyptian Civilization How ASEAN Joined Forces to Strengthen Southeast Asia The Ancient Site of Rujm el Hiri is a 5,000 Year Old Observatory What and Where is the Ancient Capital of Erlitou? Where Did the First Farmers of Scandinavia Come From? Who Was the Famous Dancing Girl of Mohenjo-Daro?