Broad Spectrum Revolution - Why We Stopped Following the Paleo Diet

The Theory of the Origins of Agriculture: Broad Spectrum Revolution

Libya, Sahara, Tadrart Acacus, cave art on sandstone wall
Cave Painting of Hunters at Tadrart Acacus, Algeria. Philippe Bourseiller / Getty Images

The Broad Spectrum Revolution (abbreviated BSR) refers to a human subsistence shift at the end of the last Ice Age (ca 15,000-8,000 years ago). During the Upper Paleolithic (UP), people all over the globe survived on diets made up of the meat from large-bodied terrestrial mammals--the first "paleo diet". But at some point after the Last Glacial Maximum, their descendants broadened their subsistence strategies to include hunting small animals and and foraging for plants, becoming hunter-gatherers.

Eventually, we began domesticating those plants and animals, radically changing our way of life. Archaeologists have been trying to figure out the mechanisms that made those changes happen since the early decades of the 20th century.

Braidwood to Binford to Flannery

The term Broad Spectrum Revolution was coined in 1969 by archaeologist Kent Flannery, who created the idea to get a better understanding of how humans changed from Upper Paleolithic hunters to Neolithic farmers in the Near East. Of course, the idea didn't come out of thin air: BSR was developed as a response to Lewis Binford's theory about why that change happened; and Binford's theory was a response to Robert Braidwood.

In the early 1960s, Braidwood suggested that agriculture was the product of experimentation with wild resources in optimal environments (the "hilly flanks" theory): but he didn't include a mechanism that explained why people would do that.

In 1968, Binford argued that such changes could only be forced by something that disrupted the existing equilibrium between resources and technology--big mammal hunting technologies worked in the UP for tens of thousands of years. Binford suggested that disruptive element was climate change--the rise in sea level at the end of the Pleistocene reduced the overall land available to populations and forced them to find new strategies.

By the way--Braidwood himself was responding to V.G. Childe's Oasis Theory: and the changes weren't linear--a lot of scholars were working this problem, in all of the ways typical of the messy, exhilarating process of theoretical change in archaeology.

Flannery's Marginal Areas and Population Growth

In 1969, Flannery was working in the Near East in the Zagros mountains far from the impacts of sea level rises, and that mechanism wasn't going to work well for that region. Instead, he proposed that hunters began to use invertebrates, fish, water fowl and plant resources as a response to localized population density.

Flannery argued that, given a choice, people live in optimal habitats, the best places for whatever their subsistence strategy happens to be; but by the end of the Pleistocene, those locations had become too crowded for hunting big mammals to work. Daughter groups budded off and moved into areas that were not so optimal, so-called "marginal areas". The old subsistence methods wouldn't work in these marginal areas, and instead people began exploiting an increasing array of small game species and plants.

Putting the People Back In

The real problem with BSR, though, is what created Flannery's notion in the first place--that environments and conditions are different throughout time and space.

The world of 15,000 years ago, not unlike today, was made up of a wide variety of environments, with different amounts of patchy resources and different levels of plant and animal scarcity and abundance. Societies were structured with different gender and societal organizations, and used different levels of mobility and intensification. Yet, diversifying resource bases is a strategy used by societies in all of these places.

With the application of niche construction theory (NCT), archaeologists today define the specific shortcomings within a specific environment (niche) and identify the adaptations that humans used to survive there. Essentially, we've recognized that human subsistence is a nearly continual process of coping with changes in resource base, whether people are adapting to environmental changes in the region where they live, or moving away from that region and adapting to new situations in new locations.

Environmental manipulation of the environment occurred and occurs in zones with optimal resources and those with less optimal ones, and BSR/NCT allows the archaeologist to measure those characteristics and get an understanding of what decisions were made and whether they were successful--or not.


This article barely scrapes the surface of this fascinating topic. I highly recommend Melinda Zeder's 2012 article, for people who want to get a great overview of the historical and theoretical changes that led to the BSR and the current state.

Allaby RG, Fuller DQ, and Brown TA. 2008. The genetic expectations of a protracted model for the origins of domesticated crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(37):13982-13986.

Abbo S, Zezak I, Schwartz E, Lev-Yadun S, Kerem Z, and Gopher A. 2008. Wild lentil and chickpea harvest in Israel: bearing on the origins of Near Eastern farming. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(12):3172-3177.

Binford LR. 1968. Post-Pleistocene adaptations. In: Binford SR, and Binford LR, editors. New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago, Illinois: Aldine. p 313-341.

Bochenski ZM, Tomek T, Wilczynski J, Svoboda J, Wertz K, and Wojtal P. 2009. Fowling during the Gravettian: the avifauna of Pavlov I, the Czech Republic. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(12):2655-2665.

Flannery KV. 1969. Origins and ecological effects of early domestication in Iran and the Near East. In: Ucko PJ, and Dimbleby GW, editors. The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals.

Chicago: Aldine. p 73-100.

Guan Y, Gao X, Li F, Pei S, Chen F, and Zhou Z. 2012. Modern human behaviors during the late stage of the MIS3 and the broad spectrum revolution: Evidence from a Shuidonggou Late Paleolithic site. Chinese Science Bulletin 57(4):379-386.

Stiner MC. 2001. Thirty years on the "Broad Spectrum Revolution" and paleolithic demography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98(13):6993-6996.

Stutz AJ, Munro ND, and Bar-Oz G. 2009. Increasing the resolution of the Broad Spectrum Revolution in the Southern Levantine Epipaleolithic (19–12 ka). Journal of Human Evolution 56(3):294-306.

Weiss E, Wetterstrom W, Nadel D, and Bar-Yosef O. 2004. The broad spectrum revisited: Evidence from plant remains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(26):9551-9555.

Zeder MA. 2012. The Broad Spectrum Revolution at 40: Resource diversity, intensification, and an alternative to optimal foraging explanations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 31(3):241-264.

mla apa chicago
Your Citation
Hirst, K. Kris. "Broad Spectrum Revolution - Why We Stopped Following the Paleo Diet." ThoughtCo, May. 25, 2016, Hirst, K. Kris. (2016, May 25). Broad Spectrum Revolution - Why We Stopped Following the Paleo Diet. Retrieved from Hirst, K. Kris. "Broad Spectrum Revolution - Why We Stopped Following the Paleo Diet." ThoughtCo. (accessed May 25, 2018).