Humanities › History & Culture Do Statues of Riders or Knights Conceal Codes? An Urban Legend Debunked Share Flipboard Email Print Hans-Peter Merten/robertharding/Getty Images History & Culture European History European History Figures & Events Wars & Battles The Holocaust European Revolutions Industry and Agriculture History in Europe American History African American History African History Ancient History and Culture Asian History Genealogy Inventions Latin American History Medieval & Renaissance History Military History The 20th Century Women's History View More By Robert Wilde History Expert M.A., Medieval Studies, Sheffield University B.A., Medieval Studies, Sheffield University Robert Wilde is a historian who writes about European history. He is the author of the History in an Afternoon textbook series. our editorial process Robert Wilde Updated September 09, 2019 There are statues all over the place, all over the world, but a set of myths have developed regarding some statues in Europe. In particular, statues of people on horseback and statues of medieval knights and monarchs are often spread about. The Myths On a statue of a horse and rider, the number of legs in the air reveals information about how the rider died: both legs in the air means they died during a battle, one leg in the air means they died later of wounds inflicted during a battle. If all four legs are on the ground, then they died in a manner unconnected to any battles they might have been in.On a statue or grave covering of a knight, the crossing of the legs (sometimes arms) indicates whether they took part in a crusade: if the crossing is present, they went on crusade. (And if everything is straight, they avoided all that.) The Truth Concerning European history, there is no tradition of indicating on a statue how the individual died, nor how many crusades they went on. You cannot safely infer those things from the stone itself and will have to refer to biographies of the deceased (assuming there are reliable biographies, and more than a few of those are untrustworthy). The Conclusion While Snopes.com claims that part one of this legend is somewhat true with regards to the statues of the Battle of Gettysburg (and even this might not be deliberate), there is no established tradition of doing this in Europe, although the myth is widespread there. The supposed logic behind part two is that the crossed legs are another symbol of the Christian cross, a prominent symbol of crusades; crusaders were often said to have "taken the cross" when they went on crusade. However, there are numerous statues of people known to have gone on crusade with uncrossed legs, and vice versa, just as there are riders on statues with raised legs who died of natural causes. This isn’t to say that there are no statues of either type which fit these myths, but these are just coincidences or one-offs. Of course, it would be handy if the myths were true, even if it would give people an excuse to bore you on a walk around by pointing it out all the time. The problem is, people (and books) try to do it anyway, and they're almost always wrong. It's unclear where the horses' legs myth came from, and it would be fascinating to know how that developed!