Abstract Art: An Introduction

An introduction to abstract art and painting: what it is, how it developed.

Format
mla apa chicago
Your Citation
Boddy-Evans, Marion. "Abstract Art: An Introduction." ThoughtCo, Nov. 4, 2016, thoughtco.com/introduction-to-abstract-art-2577325. Boddy-Evans, Marion. (2016, November 4). Abstract Art: An Introduction. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/introduction-to-abstract-art-2577325 Boddy-Evans, Marion. "Abstract Art: An Introduction." ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/introduction-to-abstract-art-2577325 (accessed September 23, 2017).
Abstract image of grove of trees
Bob Cornelis/Photolibrary/Getty Images

"Of all the arts, abstract painting is the most difficult. It demands that you know how to draw well, that you have a heightened sensitivity for composition and for colors, and that you be a true poet. This last is essential." -- Wassily Kandinsky.

In its purest form in Western art, an abstract art is one without a recognizable subject, one which doesn't relate to anything external or try to "look like" something.

Instead, the color and form (and often the materials and support) are the subject of the abstract painting. It's completely non-objective or non-representational.

A further distinction tends to be made between abstract art which is geometric, such as the work of Mondrian, and abstract art that is more fluid (and where the apparent spontaneity often belies careful planning and execution), such as the abstract art of Kandinsky or Pollock.

Also generally classified with abstract art are figurative abstractions and paintings which represent things that aren't visual, such an emotion, sound, or spiritual experience. Figurative abstractions are abstractions or simplifications of reality, where detail is eliminated from recognizable objects leaving only the essence or some degree of recognizable form.

In Western art history, the break from the notion that a painting had to represent something happened in the early 20th century.

Impressionism, Fauvism, Cubism and other art movements of the time all contributed by breaking the "rules" of art followed since The Renaissance. Impressionism saw painters not "finishing" their paintings. The Fauvists used color in a non-realistic way. Cubism introduced the idea of painting an object from more than one viewpoint.

From all of these, the idea developed that color, line, form, and texture could be the "subject" of the painting.

Abstract Expressionism, which emerged in the 1940s, applied the principles of Expressionism to abstract painting. The action painting of Jackson Pollock, in which paint was dripped, dropped, smeared, spattered, or thrown on the canvas, is a good example.

In 1864 the critic Ernest Chesneau wrote that if the trend the Impressionists were setting continued, paintings would eventually consist of nothing but "two broadly brushed areas of color". What would he have thought of the art being produced 100 years later?