Humanities › English An Overview of Classical Rhetoric Origins, Branches, Canons and Concepts Share Flipboard Email Print Classical rhetoric has its roots with the Greek philosophers. George Papapostolou / Getty Images English English Grammar An Introduction to Punctuation Writing By Richard Nordquist English and Rhetoric Professor Ph.D., Rhetoric and English, University of Georgia M.A., Modern English and American Literature, University of Leicester B.A., English, State University of New York Dr. Richard Nordquist is professor emeritus of rhetoric and English at Georgia Southern University and the author of several university-level grammar and composition textbooks. our editorial process Richard Nordquist Updated October 05, 2019 What do you think of when you hear the word rhetoric? The practice and study of effective communication — especially persuasive communication — or the "rascally" bloviations of pundits, politicians and the like? Turns out that, in a way, both are correct, but there's a bit more nuance to speaking of classical rhetoric. As defined by the Twente University in the Netherlands, classical rhetoric is the perception of how language works when written or spoken aloud or becoming proficient in speaking or writing due to proficiency in this understanding. Classical rhetoric is a combination of persuasion and argument, broken into three branches and five canons as dictated by the Greek teachers: Plato, the Sophists, Cicero, Quintilian, and Aristotle. Core Concepts According to the 1970 textbook Rhetoric: Discovery and Change, the word rhetoric can be traced back ultimately to the simple Greek assertation 'eiro,' or "I say" in English. Richard E. Young, Alton L. Becker and Kenneth L. Pike claim "Almost anything related to the act of saying something to someone — in speech or in writing — can conceivably fall within the domain of rhetoric as a field of study." The rhetoric studied in ancient Greece and Rome (from roughly the fifth century B.C. to the early Middle Ages) was originally intended to help citizens plead their cases in court. Though the early teachers of rhetoric, known as Sophists, were criticized by Plato and other philosophers, the study of rhetoric soon became the cornerstone of a classical education. On the other hand, Philostratus the Athenian, in his teachings from 230-238 A.D. "Lives of the Sophists," posts that in the study of rhetoric, philosophers considered it both praise-worthy and suspect of being "rascally," and "mercenary and constituted in spite of justice." Not only meant for the crowd but also the "men of sound culture," referring to those with skills in invention and exposition of themes as "clever rhetoricians." These conflicting perceptions of rhetoric as either proficiency in language application (persuasive communication) versus mastery of manipulation have been around for at least 2,500 years and show no sign of being resolved. As Dr. Jane Hodson observed in her 2007 book Language and Revolution in Burke, Wollstonecraft, Pine, and Godwin, "The confusion which surrounds the word 'rhetoric' has to be understood as a result of the historical development of rhetoric itself." Despite these conflicts over the purpose and morality of rhetoric, modern theories of oral and written communication remain heavily influenced by the rhetorical principles introduced in ancient Greece by Isocrates and Aristotle, and in Rome by Cicero and Quintilian. Three Branches and Five Cannons According to Aristotle, the three branches of rhetoric are divided and "determined by three classes of listeners to speeches, for of the three elements in speech-making — speaker, subject, and person addressed — it is the last one, the hearer, that determines the speech's end and object." These three divisions are typically called deliberative rhetoric, judicial rhetoric, and epideictic rhetoric. In legislative or deliberative rhetoric, the speech or writing attempts to get an audience to take or not to take an action, focusing on the things to come and what the crowd can do to influence the outcome. Forensic or judicial rhetoric, on the other hand, deals more with determining the justice or injustice of an accusation or charge that happened in the present, dealing with the past. Judicial rhetoric would be the rhetoric used more by lawyers and judges who determine the core value of justice. Similarly, the final branch — known as epideictic or ceremonial rhetoric — deals with praising or blaming someone or something. It largely concerns itself with speeches and writings such as obituaries, letters of recommendation and sometimes even literary works. With these three branches in mind, the application and usage of rhetoric became the focus of Roman philosophers, who later developed the idea of five canons of rhetoric. Principle among them, Cicero and the unknown author of "Rhetorica ad Herennium" defined the canons as the five overlapping divisions of the rhetorical process: invention, arrangement, style, memory, and delivery. Invention is defined as the art of finding the appropriate arguments, using thorough research of the topic at hand as well as of the intended audience. As one might expect, arrangement deals with the skills of structuring an argument; classic speeches often were constructed with specific segments. Style encompasses a broad range of things, but most often refers to things like word choice and speech structure. Memory is less known in modern rhetoric, but in classical rhetoric, it referred to any and all techniques of aiding memorization. Finally, delivery is similar to style, but rather than concerning itself with the text itself, it's focused on the style of voice and gesture on the orator's part. Teaching Concepts and Practical Application There are a number of ways throughout the ages that teachers have offered students a chance to apply and sharpen their rhetoric skills. The Progymnasmata, for example, are preliminary writing exercises that introduce students to basic rhetorical concepts and strategies. In classical rhetorical training, these exercises were structured so that the student would progress from strictly imitating speech to an understanding and application of an artistic melding of the concerns of the speaker, subject, and audience. Throughout history, many major figures have shaped the core teachings of rhetoric and our modern understanding of classical rhetoric. From the functions of figurative language in the context of particular eras of poetry and essays, speeches and other texts to the various effects created and meaning conveyed by a variety of nuanced vocabulary words, there is no doubt of the impact classical rhetoric has on modern communication. When it comes to teaching these principles, it's best to start with the basics, the founders of the art of conversation — Greek philosophers and teachers of classical rhetoric — and work your way forward in time from there.