The McDonald v. Chicago Second Amendment Decision

Supreme Court Ruling Confirms an Individual's Right to Keep and Bear Arms

Pistol Shooting
Premium/UIG Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right to keep and bear arms extends to individuals in each of the 50 U.S. states in McDonald vs. Chicago in 2010. It was a first-time, landmark 5-4 decision, and it came on the heels of the 2008 D.C. vs. Heller decision, another resounding victory in the nation's highest court for gun owners. 

Background of McDonald v. Chicago 

Nearly two years to the day before the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in McDonald vs. Chicago, the high court issued its most important Second Amendment-related ruling in 70 years.

In D.C. vs. Heller, the Supreme Court confirmed that the right to keep and bear arms extends to individuals in federal enclaves, such as Washington, D.C. But the Court didn't address the right of states to restrict individual gun ownership. That remained a matter of dispute. 

A 76-year-old Chicago retiree named Otis McDonald was selected to challenge the Windy City’s 1982 law banning handgun possession shortly after the Heller decision. McDonald was joined by three other plaintiffs, Adam Orlov and David and Colleen Lawson. The case was organized by Alan Gura, the Virginia attorney who argued the Heller case.

After setbacks in trial court and in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Second Amendment Foundation appealed the McDonald case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Arguments were heard on March 7, 2010 and the court’s ruling was issued June 28, 2010, reversing the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision and dealing a fatal blow to Chicago’s 28-year gun ban.

The Majority Opinion

The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the Second Amendment was incorporated into the Constitution by the due process section of the 14th Amendment. Individuals were therefore granted a constitutional right to keep firearms in their homes for self-protection, a right that was deemed greater than a state's power to restrict it.

"It cannot be doubted that the right to bear arms was regarded as a substantive guarantee, not a prohibition that could be ignored so long as states legislated in an evenhanded manner,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority.

Joining Alito in the opinion were Chief Justice John G. Roberts and associate justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

Alito also noted in the opinion that Chicago’s handgun ban was put into place in 1982 to protect residents from injury or death, but the handgun murder rate had actually increased since the ban was put in place. “Chicago residents now face one of the highest murder rates in the country,” Alito wrote.

The majority drew heavily on the Heller decision, calling self-defense “a basic right, recognized by many legal systems from ancient times to the present day.”

The Dissenting Opinion

Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul Stevens and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. Writing on behalf of the minority, Justice Breyer predicted that the decision “may change the law in many of the 50 states.” He added that historical evidence for the majority decision was “at most ambiguous.”

In a separate dissenting opinion, Justice Stevens wrote that the majority decision exceeded the scope of the 14th Amendment, which does not necessarily protect constitutional infringement by states in the same manner that it protects federal infringement.

“This is a quintessential area in which federalism ought to be allowed to flourish without this court’s meddling,” Stevens wrote.

The Impact of the Decision 

The decision's most immediate impact was specific confirmation of the right of individuals in the U.S. to possess handguns for self-defense. Although the ruling did not specifically strike down laws banning handgun possession in Chicago and its Oak Park suburb, Mayor Richard Daley admitted that the ruling made those laws “unenforceable.”

The Supreme Court held that state and federal laws prohibiting possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, as well as possession of firearms inside public schools, passed constitutional muster, just as they'd found in the Heller decision. 

Format
mla apa chicago
Your Citation
Garrett, Ben. "The McDonald v. Chicago Second Amendment Decision." ThoughtCo, Aug. 5, 2017, thoughtco.com/overview-of-mcdonald-v-chicago-case-721357. Garrett, Ben. (2017, August 5). The McDonald v. Chicago Second Amendment Decision. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/overview-of-mcdonald-v-chicago-case-721357 Garrett, Ben. "The McDonald v. Chicago Second Amendment Decision." ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/overview-of-mcdonald-v-chicago-case-721357 (accessed November 21, 2017).