Science, Tech, Math › Social Sciences The Shut-Down Condition Share Flipboard Email Print Social Sciences Economics U.S. Economy Employment Supply & Demand Psychology Sociology Archaeology Ergonomics Maritime By Jodi Beggs Economics Expert Ph.D., Business Economics, Harvard University M.A., Economics, Harvard University B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jodi Beggs, Ph.D., is an economist and data scientist. She teaches economics at Harvard and serves as a subject-matter expert for media outlets including Reuters, BBC, and Slate. our editorial process Jodi Beggs Updated August 13, 2018 01 of 08 Production in the Short Run Westend61/Getty Images Economists distinguish the short run from the long run in competitive markets by, among other things, noting that in the short run companies that have decided to enter an industry have already paid their fixed costs and can't fully exit an industry. For example, over short time horizons, many companies are committed to paying a lease on office or retail space and must do so regardless of whether or not they produce any output. In economic terms, these up-front costs are considered sunk costs- costs that have already been paid (or have been committed to be paid) and can't be recovered. (Note, however, that the cost of the lease wouldn't be a sunk cost if the company could sublet the space to another company.) If, in the short run, a firm in a competitive market faces these sunk costs, how does it decide when to produce output and when to shut down and produce nothing? 02 of 08 Profit if a Firm Decides to Produce If a firm decides to produce output, it will select the quantity of output that maximizes its profit (or, if positive profit is not possible, minimizes its loss). Its profit will then be equal to its total revenue minus total cost. With a little arithmetic manipulation as well as the definitions of revenue and costs, we can also say that profit is equal to output price times quantity produced minus total fixed cost minus total variable cost. To take this one step further, we can note that total variable cost is equal to average variable cost times the quantity produced, which gives us that the firm's profit equals output price times quantity minus total fixed cost minus average variable cost times quantity, as shown above. 03 of 08 Profit if a Firm Decides to Shut Down If the firm decides to shut down and not produce any output, its revenue by definition is zero. Its variable cost of production is also zero by definition, so the firm's total cost of production is equal to its fixed cost. The firm's profit, therefore, is equal to zero minus total fixed cost, as shown above. 04 of 08 The Shut-Down Condition Intuitively, a firm wants to produce if the profit from doing so it at least as large as the profit from shutting down. (Technically, the firm is indifferent between producing and not producing if both options yield the same level of profit.) Therefore, we can compare the profits that we derived in the previous steps to figure out when the firm will actually be willing to produce. To do this, we just set up the appropriate inequality, as shown above. 05 of 08 Fixed Costs and the Shut-Down Condition We can do a bit of algebra to simplify our shut-down condition and provide a clearer picture. The first thing to notice when we do this is that fixed cost cancels out in our inequality and is therefore not a factor in our decision regarding whether or not to shut down. This makes sense since the fixed cost is present regardless of which course of action is taken and therefore logically shouldn't be a factor in the decision. 06 of 08 The Shut-Down Condition We can simplify the inequality even further and arrive at the conclusion that the firm will want to produce if the price it receives for its output is at least as large as its average variable cost of production at the profit-maximizing quantity of output, as shown above. Because the firm will produce at the profit maximizing quantity, which is the quantity where the price of its output is equal to its marginal cost of production, we can conclude that the firm will choose to produce whenever the price it receives for its output is at least as large as the minimum average variable cost that it can achieve. This is simply the result of the fact that marginal cost intersects average variable cost at average variable cost's minimum. The observation that a firm will produce in the short run if it receives a price for its output that is at least a large as the minimum average variable cost it can achieve is known as the shut-down condition. 07 of 08 The Shut-Down Condition in Graph Form We can also show the shut-down condition graphically. In the diagram above, the firm will be willing to produce at prices greater than or equal to Pmin, since this is the minimum value of the average variable cost curve. At prices below Pmin, the firm will decide to shut down and produce a quantity of zero instead. 08 of 08 Some Notes About the Shut-Down Condition It's important to keep in mind that the shut-down condition is a short-run phenomenon, and the condition for a firm to stay in an industry in the long run is not the same as the shut-down condition. This is because, in the short run, a firm might produce even if producing results in an economic loss because not producing would result in an even bigger loss. (In other words, producing is beneficial if it at least brings in enough revenue to start covering the sunk fixed costs.) It's also helpful to note that, while the shut-down condition was described here in the context of a firm in a competitive market, the logic that a firm will be willing to produce in the short run as long as the revenue from doing so covers the variable (i.e. recoverable) costs of production holds for companies in any type of market.