Perry March Convicted of Wife's Murder

It Took 10 Years, but Finally Justice Was Served

Perry March and Janet Levine March
Perry March and Janet Levine March. Police Photos

The wife of a successful corporate lawyer mysteriously disappeared from her four-acre Forest Hills estate in Nashville in August 1996, leaving her husband, two children, and her thriving career as a painter behind her. Rumors spread like wildfire, but there was no evidence of foul play or that any crime had been committed.

Gone Missing

On the evening of August 15, 1996, Perry and Janet March got into an argument and, according to Perry, Janet decided to take a 12-day vacation.

She packed three bags, around $5,000 in cash, a bag of marijuana, and her passport, and drove off in her gray four-door 1996 Volvo 850 at 8:30 p.m., without telling anyone where she was going.

Around midnight that night, Perry contacted his in-laws, Lawrence and Carolyn Levine, and told them that Janet was gone. At first, the Levines didn't worry, but as time went on, their concerns grew. They wanted to contact the police but later said Perry had discouraged them from doing it. Perry said it was the other way around.

For several days Perry and the Levines searched for Janet, but when their efforts failed, they contacted the police together. It had been two weeks since Janet had disappeared.

Perry and Janet had two children together -- their son Samson and daughter Tzipora. Perry said Janet planned to return by August 27 to celebrate Samson's birthday. However,  this was odd because Samson's birthday party was scheduled for August 25, two days before Janet's return date.

Investigators learned that during the day of August 15, Janet asked her mother to go with her to see a divorce attorney the next day. According to authorities, Janet had discovered that Perry had to forfeit $25,000 after he was caught writing sexually explicit letters anonymously to a paralegal that worked in his office.

They believe that Janet had confronted Perry about wanting a divorce, and an argument had erupted.  

The Rolled-Up Rug

There were also questions about a rug that was seen at the March home the day after Janet disappeared. On Friday, August 16, Marissa Moody and Janet March had planned to meet for part of the day so that their sons could play together. When Moody arrived at the March home at the scheduled time, Janet was not home. Perry was home, working in his office, but he did not come out to greet Moody. He merely sent word through Samson that she could still drop off her son to play.

While at the March home, Moody noticed a large, dark rolled up rug that was lying on the floor. It was especially noticeable for two reasons;  Samson was bouncing on one end of it, and Janet kept the home's beautiful hardwood floors polished and rug free.

When Moody returned to pick up her son, she noticed that the rug was gone.

Another witness surfaced stating that they had also seen a rug at the March home on August 16. However, Ella Goldshmid, the March children's nanny, did not recall seeing a rug.

When investigators questioned Perry about the rug, he denied that it existed and said that Moody never entered the home on the day that she claims to have seen a rug.

Perry's denial about the rug led detectives to theorize that during the couple's argument the night before, Perry, who held a black belt in karate, could have killed Janet, who weighed just 104 pounds, hidden her body inside the rug, then disposed of it the following day.

More Suspicious Notes

On September 7, Janet's car was located at a Nashville apartment complex. The police found Janet's passport and other personal effects, but there was no sign of Janet.

A flight attendant remembered seeing someone that looked like Perry,  leaving the apartment complex on a mountain bike at around 1:00 a.m. on the night Janet disappeared.

Janet's car was backed into the parking place. According to Janet's best friend, she only pulled into parking places and never backed into a spot.

Perry and Janet shared a personal computer and not long after she went missing, so did the computer's hard drive.

Leaving Nashville

In September, a month after Janet disappeared, Perry and the children moved to Chicago. Shortly after the move, Perry and his in-laws, the Levines, got into a legal battle over Janet's assets. Perry wanted to be granted control of her assets and the Levines opposed it. They also wanted rights, which Perry was vehemently opposed to, saying that they only wanted visitation so that the detectives could interview the children.

In 1999 the court awarded the Levines visitation, but before they could see the children, Perry moved his family to his father's house in Ajijic, Mexico.

In response, the Levines had Janet declared legally dead and filed a civil lawsuit against Perry for wrongful death in the disappearance of their daughter. Perry failed to show up for court, and the Levines were awarded $133 million. Perry had the verdict overturned on appeal.


A year after moving to Mexico, Perry married Carmen Rojas Solorio. The couple had a child together.

The Levines continued their fight to visit their grandchildren. With the help of the Mexican government, they were able to bring Samson and Tzipora to Tennessee for a maximum visitation of 39 days. The Levines then began their fight to gain full custody of the children.

Perry felt that the Levines had abducted his children and two Tennessee attorneys agreed to represent him pro bono.  The Levines lost, and the children were returned to their father.

Cold Case Detectives

In early 2000, two cold case detectives revisited the disappearance of Janet March.

By 2004, the investigators and the prosecutor's office had compiled evidence against Perry and presented it to a grand jury. The jury returned an indictment against Perry on charges of second-degree murder, tampering with evidence, and abuse of a corpse. Perry was also indicted for felony theft for an alleged 1999 theft of $23,000 from his father-in-law's firm where he was working. Perry presumably stole the money to raise the $25,000 that would quash claims by the paralegal that he had written her sexually explicit letters.

The indictment remained secret until the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Mexican government could work out Perry's extradition.

In August 2005, nearly nine years after Janet March disappeared, Perry March was deported from Mexico and placed under arrest. During the bond hearing, one of the cold case detectives,  Pat Postiglione, stated that during the flight from Mexico to Nashville, Perry said he was willing to plead guilty in exchange for a sentence of no more than five to seven years. Perry denies ever making such a statement.

A Plot to Kill the In-Laws

Perry was held in the Nashville County jail. There he befriended inmate Russell Farris, who was awaiting trial for attempted murder. Perry told Farris that he could arrange to have his bond posted if he would agree to kill the Levines. The discussion went on for weeks. Farris ended up telling his attorney about it, and the information was turned over to the authorities. Farris agreed to work with the police and future conversations between the two men were recorded.

Also recorded were conversations Farris had with Perry's father, Arthur March, who was still living in Mexico. Arthur told Ferris the best time of day to go to the Levine's home, how to obtain a gun, the type of gun to get, and how to travel to Ajijic, Mexico after he had killed the Levines.

Farris told Perry he was being released, although he was really being transferred to another county jail. Before Farris left, Perry wrote down the Levine's address and handed him the piece of paper.

Perry was arrested and charged with two counts of solicitation to commit murder by the Davidson County prosecutors. He was also charged with two counts of conspiring to commit murder by federal prosecutors. Perry’s father Arthur was also charged with the same crimes but remained in Mexico as a fugitive.

In 2006, Arthur pleaded guilty to the solicitation charge and worked out a plea deal in exchange for his testimony against Perry for the murder of Janet March.

Perry's Trials

In April 2006 Perry was found guilty of embezzling $23,000 from his father-in-law's firm. In June 2006 he was convicted of the conspiracy to murder the Levines. In August 2006, Perry went on trial for second-degree murder, tampering with evidence, and abuse of a corpse.

Along with other evidence, a videotaped deposition given by Arthur March was played for the jury. In it, Arthur talked about how much he disliked the Levines and spoke with disdain about Janet.

He then said that Perry killed Janet by striking her with a wrench. A few weeks after her murder, Perry had driven Arthur to where he had disposed of the body and explained that it had to be moved because it was about to become a construction site. The two then drove Janet's remains to Bowling Green, Kentucky, where Arthur disposed of it in some thick brush.


On August 17, 2006, just a week after the trial had started, the jury deliberated for 10 hours before reaching their verdict of guilty on all charges.

Perry was sentenced to a total of 56 years for murdering Janet and for the attempted murder-for-hire of the Levines. He will not be eligible for parole until 2040.

Arthur March was sentenced to five years for the attempted murder-for-hire of the Levines. He died three months later.

mla apa chicago
Your Citation
Montaldo, Charles. "Perry March Convicted of Wife's Murder." ThoughtCo, Mar. 2, 2018, Montaldo, Charles. (2018, March 2). Perry March Convicted of Wife's Murder. Retrieved from Montaldo, Charles. "Perry March Convicted of Wife's Murder." ThoughtCo. (accessed May 22, 2018).