Overview of the Second Punic War of Rome

Roman Forum in Rome, Italy
Michael Denora / Getty Images

At the end of the First Punic War, in 241 B.C., Carthage agreed to pay a steep tribute to Rome, but depleting the coffers wasn't enough to devastate the north African nation of traders and merchants: Rome and Carthage would soon fight again.

In the interim between the First and Second Punic Wars (also known as the Hannibalic War), the Phoenician hero and military leader Hamilcar Barca conquered much of Spain, while Rome took Corsica. Hamilcar longed to get revenge against the Romans for the defeat in Punic War I, but realizing that wasn't to be, he taught hatred of Rome to his son, Hannibal.

Hannibal and Second Punic War General

The Second Punic War broke out in 218 when Hannibal took control of the Greek city and Roman ally, Saguntum (in Spain). Rome thought it would be easy to defeat Hannibal, but Hannibal was full of surprises, including his manner of entering the Italic peninsula from Spain. Leaving 20,000 troops with his brother Hasdrubal, Hannibal went further north on the Rhone River than the Romans expected and crossed the river with his elephants on flotation devices. He didn't have as much manpower as the Romans, but he counted on the support and alliance of Italian tribes unhappy with Rome.

Hannibal reached the Po Valley with less than half his men. He had also encountered unexpected resistance from local tribes, although he did manage to recruit Gauls. This meant he had 30,000 troops by the time he met the Romans in battle.

Hannibal's Greatest Second Punic War Victory: The Battle of Cannae (216 B.C.)

Hannibal won battles in Trebia and at Lake Trasimene and then continued through the Apennine Mountains that run down through much of Italy like a spine. With troops from Gaul and Spain on his side, Hannibal won another battle, at Cannae, against Lucius Aemilius. At the Battle of Cannae, the Romans lost thousands of troops, including their leader. The historian Polybius describes both sides as gallant. He writes about the substantial losses:

"Of the infantry ten thousand were taken prisoners in fair fight, but were not actually engaged in the battle: of those who were actually engaged only about three thousand perhaps escaped to the towns of the surrounding district; all the rest died nobly, to the number of seventy thousand, the Carthaginians being on this occasion, as on previous ones, mainly indebted for their victory to their superiority in cavalry: a lesson to posterity that in actual war it is better to have half the number of infantry, and the superiority in cavalry, than to engage your enemy with an equality in both. On the side of Hannibal there fell four thousand Celts, fifteen hundred Iberians and Libyans, and about two hundred horse."  Polybius - The Battle of Cannae 216 B.C.

Besides trashing the countryside (which both sides did in an effort to starve the enemy), Hannibal terrorized the towns of southern Italy in an effort to gain allies.

Chronologically, Rome's First Macedonian War fits in around here (215-205). Hannibal allied himself with Philip V of Macedonia.

The next general to confront Hannibal was more successful; that is, there was no decisive victory. However, the Senate in Carthage refused to send in enough troops to enable Hannibal to win. So Hannibal turned to his brother Hasdrubal for help. Unfortunately for Hannibal, Hasdrubal was killed en route to join him, marking the first decisive Roman victory in the Second Punic War. More than 10,000 Carthaginians died at the Battle of Metaurus in 207 B.C.

Scipio and Second Punic War General

Meanwhile, Scipio invaded North Africa. The Carthaginian Senate responded by recalling Hannibal.

The Romans under Scipio fought the Phoenicians under Hannibal at Zama. Hannibal, who no longer had an adequate cavalry, was unable to follow his preferred tactics. Instead, Scipio routed the Carthaginians using the same (http://www.roman-empire.net/army/cannae.html) strategy Hannibal had used at Cannae.

Hannibal put an end to the Second Punic War. Scipio's stringent terms of surrender were to:

  • hand over all warships and elephants
  • not make war without the permission of Rome
  • pay Rome 10,000 talents over the next 50 years.

The terms included an additional, difficult proviso:

  • should armed Carthaginians cross a border the Romans drew in the dirt, it automatically meant war with Rome.

This meant that the Carthaginians could be put in a position where they might not be able to defend their own interests.

Some Primary Sources

  • Polybius, 2.1, 13, 36; 3.6-15, 17, 20-35, 39-56; 4.37.
  • Livy, 21
  • (http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/12*.html) Dio Cassius
  • Diodorus Siculus, 24.1-16.