How Sexism Impacts Student Evaluations of Professors

Studies show men are overly praised while women are overly criticized

A woman professor gives a lecture to a classroom of university students. Women faculty are routinely rated less favorably than men in student evaluations of their teaching performance.
Hero Images/Getty Images

Sexism and gender discrimination are well documented in the United States. They lead to an unjust pay and wealth gap, to unequal access to educational resources, and even to an orgasm gap. Now, they've been clearly documented in student evaluations of college and university faculty.

Students Routinely Describe Men as Smarter than Women Professors

Dr. Benjamin M. Schmidt, a professor of history at Northeastern University, culled together reviews on RateMyProfessor.com and put them into a handy data visualizer that allows readers to see how men and women, across fields, stack up according to students.

By charting how frequently certain words are used in reviews, Dr. Schmidt's research shows unequivocally what women faculty have long suspected: student evaluations are systematically biased against women.

Men and the courses they teach are more commonly described as smart, intelligent, brilliant, fascinating, interesting, and wise, across all academic disciplines. Their courses are also more likely to be described as rewarding. This shows that there is a very real gender bias present in how students rate the intellectual ability of faculty, which reflects a general societal bias.

Students Show More Respect for Male Faculty Members

The data show a clear gender bias in affording more respect to men than to women. Men are more likely to be referred to as "doctor" and universally more likely across all fields to be referred to as "professor." Conversely, women are more likely to be referred to as "miss" than are men to be referred to as "mister." This suggests that, just as men are perceived as more intelligent, that intelligence is afforded respect and authority that is not extended to women in equal measure.

Students Apply Gendered Double Standards to Women Faculty

Reflecting deeply entrenched gender stereotypes and expectations for gendered behavior, what women are praised for, more so than men, is the emotional labor (or perceived emotional labor) they provide. Across all fields, women are more likely to be described as nice, caring, understanding, and across most fields, more likely to be described as kind and warm.

But, while women are praised for meeting stereotypical gendered expectations, they are penalized for not doing so. The data show that women are far more likely than men to be described as mean, harsh, rude, and cold.

Students Are More Likely to Comment on Professionalism of Women Faculty

Likely related to the lesser form of authority granted to women than men, students take more liberties in commenting on the professionalism of women, who are more likely than men to be described as both professional and unprofessional. Students also take greater license in commenting on the administrative aspects of teaching when it comes to women faculty, who they describe more frequently as both prepared and unprepared, and as organized and disorganized. Women are also universally more often described as scattered and late.

Other Studies Confirm the Results

You might be wondering, "Is it possible that women are just not as good at teaching as men?" Which, based on this data alone, is a fair question. But as it turns out, the answer is a resounding "No!" Numerous scientific studies have found clear evidence of gender bias in how students evaluate teachers ​and have found that that bias works strongly in favor of men.

One found that to get high ratings, women must be both sensitive and agentic (organized and proactive), whereas men had only to be agentic to be highly rated. This shows clearly that women are expected to do and give more—specifically, stereotypically feminine things that are not a part of their job description—in order to be viewed positively by students. Another found that students taking online classes, who never even meet their instructor face-to-face, rate instructors they think are men higher than those they think are women. And another found that this gender bias persists across regions and size of schools.

Results like these are quite troubling, as student evaluations are often used as part of overall performance assessment by superiors, especially among the huge population of adjunct faculty who teach on a short-term contract basis.

As such, employment and professional advancement may be at stake for many women.

Cumulatively, these studies suggest that student evaluations, while they might provide useful feedback to faculty, are deeply flawed tools for assessing faculty performance and should play no role in institutional employment decisions.