Humanities › Issues Shays' Rebellion of 1786 Share Flipboard Email Print Table of Contents Expand Taxes in the Face of Poverty Enter Daniel Shays A Mood for Rebellion Grows Shays Attacks the Courts Attack on the Springfield Armory The Punishment Phase Effects of Shays’ Rebellion Issues The U. S. Government U.S. Constitution & Bill of Rights History & Major Milestones U.S. Legal System U.S. Political System Income Tax & The IRS Defense & Security Consumer Awareness Campaigns & Elections Business & Finance U.S. Foreign Policy U.S. Liberal Politics U.S. Conservative Politics Women's Issues Civil Liberties The Middle East Terrorism Race Relations Immigration Crime & Punishment Animal Rights Canadian Government View More By Robert Longley History and Government Expert B.S., Texas A&M University Robert Longley is a U.S. government and history expert with over 30 years of experience in municipal government and urban planning. our editorial process Facebook Facebook Robert Longley Updated June 02, 2020 Shays’ Rebellion was a series of violent protests staged during 1786 and 1787 by a group of American farmers who objected to the way state and local tax collections were being enforced. While skirmishes broke out from New Hampshire to South Carolina, the most serious acts of the rebellion occurred in rural Massachusetts, where years of poor harvests, depressed commodity prices, and high taxes had left farmers facing the loss of their farms or even imprisonment. The rebellion is named for its leader, Revolutionary War veteran Daniel Shays of Massachusetts. Bettmann Archive / Getty Images Although it never posed a serious threat to the still loosely organized post-war United States federal government, Shays’ Rebellion drew lawmakers’ attention to serious weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation and was frequently cited in the debates leading to the framing and ratification of the Constitution. Key Takeaways: Shay’s Rebellion Shays’ Rebellion was a series of armed protests staged in 1786 by farmers in western Massachusetts against repressive debt and property tax collection practices.The farmers were aggrieved by excessive Massachusetts property taxes and penalties ranging from the foreclosure of their farms to lengthy prison terms.Led by Revolutionary War veteran Daniel Shays, the rebels stormed several courthouses in an effort to block tax collections.Shays’ Rebellion was put down on January 25, 1787, when a private army raised by Massachusetts’s Governor, James Bowdoin intercepted and defeated and arrested Shays and nearly 1500 of his followers as they attempted to seize the federal arsenal in Springfield, Missouri. Shays’ Rebellion underscored weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation and led to the creation of the U.S. Constitution. The threat posed by Shays’ Rebellion helped persuade retired General George Washington to reenter public service, leading to his two terms as the first President of the United States. In a letter regarding Shays’ Rebellion to U.S. Representative William Stephens Smith dated November 13, 1787, Founding Father Thomas Jefferson famously argued that an occasional rebellion is an essential part of liberty: “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.” Taxes in the Face of Poverty The end of the Revolutionary War found farmers in rural areas of Massachusetts living a sparse subsistence lifestyle with few assets aside from their land. Forced to barter with each other for goods or services, farmers found it difficult and prohibitively expensive to obtain credit. When they did manage to find credit, repayment was required to be in the form of hard currency, which remained in short supply after repeal of the despised British Currency Acts. Along with insurmountable commercial debt, unusually high tax rates in Massachusetts added to the financial woes of the farmers. Taxed at a rate some four times higher than in neighboring New Hampshire, a typical Massachusetts farmer was required to pay about one-third of his annual income to the state. Unable to pay either their private debts or their taxes, many farmers faced devastation. State courts would foreclose on their land and other assets, ordering them sold at public auction for a fraction of their real value. Worse yet, farmers who had already lost their land and other assets were often sentenced to spend years in dungeon-like and now illegal debtors’ prisons. Enter Daniel Shays On top of these financial hardships was the fact that many Revolutionary War veterans had received little or no pay during their time in the Continental Army and were facing roadblocks to collecting back pay owed to them by Congress or the states. Some of these soldiers, like Daniel Shays, began to organize protests against what they considered to be excessive taxes and abusive treatment by the courts. A Massachusetts farmhand when he volunteered for the Continental Army, Shays fought in the Battles of Lexington and Concord, Bunker Hill, and Saratoga. After being wounded in action, Shays resigned — unpaid — from the Army and went home where he was “rewarded” for his sacrifice by being taken to court for nonpayment of his pre-war debts. Realizing that he was far from alone in his plight, he began to organize his fellow protesters. Replacement gravestone for Captain Daniel Shays, 5th Massachusetts Infantry, Continental Army and leader of Shays' Rebellion. Billmckern/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain A Mood for Rebellion Grows With the spirit of revolution still fresh, hardships led to protest. In 1786, aggrieved citizens in four Massachusetts counties held semi-legal conventions to demand, among other reforms, lower taxes and the issuance of paper money. However, the state legislature, having already suspended tax collections for a year, refused to listen and ordered the immediate and full payment of taxes. With this, public resentment of tax collectors and the courts escalated quickly. On August 29, 1786, group of protesters succeeded in preventing the county tax court in Northampton from convening. Shays Attacks the Courts Having taken part in the Northampton protest, Daniel Shays quickly gained followers. Calling themselves “Shayites” or “Regulators,” in reference to an earlier tax reform movement in North Carolina, Shays’ group orchestrated protests at more county courthouses, effectively preventing taxes from being collected. Greatly disturbed by the tax protests, George Washington, in a letter to his close friend David Humphreys, expressed his fear that “commotions of this sort, like snow-balls, gather strength as they roll, if there is no opposition in the way to divide and crumble them.” Attack on the Springfield Armory By December 1786, the growing conflict between the farmers, their creditors, and state tax collectors drove Massachusetts Governor Bowdoin to mobilize a special army of 1,200 militiamen funded by private merchants and dedicated solely to stopping Shays and his Regulators. Led by former Continental Army General Benjamin Lincoln, Bowdoin’s special army was ready for the pivotal battle of Shays’ Rebellion. On January 25, 1787, Shays, along with some 1,500 of his Regulators attacked the federal armory at Springfield, Massachusetts. Though outnumbered, General Lincoln’s well-trained and battle-tested army had anticipated the attack and held a strategic advantage over Shays’ angry mob. After firing a few volleys of musket warning shots, Lincoln’s army leveled artillery fire on the still-advancing mob, killing four of the Regulators and wounding twenty more. The surviving rebels scattered and fled into the nearby countryside. Many of them were later captured, effectively ending Shays’ Rebellion. The Punishment Phase In exchange for immediate amnesty from prosecution, some 4,000 individuals signed confessions acknowledging their participation in the Rebellion. Several hundred participants were later indicted on a range charges relating to the rebellion. While most were pardoned, 18 men were sentenced to death. Two of them, John Bly and Charles Rose of Berkshire County, were hanged for thievery on December 6, 1787, while the rest were either pardoned, had their sentences commuted, or had their convictions overturned on appeal. Daniel Shays, who had been hiding in the Vermont forest since fleeing from his failed attack on the Springfield Armory, returned to Massachusetts after being pardoned in 1788. He later settled near Conesus, New York, where he lived in poverty until his death in 1825. Effects of Shays’ Rebellion Though it failed to achieve its goals, Shays’ Rebellion focused attention on serious weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation that prevented the national government from effectively managing the country’s finances. Petersham Historical Society with Daniel Shays' Rebellion marker - Petersham, Massachusett. Daderot/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain The obvious need for reforms led to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the replacement of the Articles of Confederation with the U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights. Governor Bowdoin’s actions in quashing the rebellion, though successful, were widely unpopular and proved to be his political downfall. In the gubernatorial election of 1787, he received few votes from the rural parts of the state and was easily defeated by famed Founding Father and first signer of the Constitution John Hancock. Additionally, the legacy of Bowdoin’s military victory was tarnished by extensive tax reforms. Over the next several years, the Massachusetts legislature cut property taxes significantly and placed a moratorium on debt collections. In addition, his concerns over the rebellion drew George Washington back into public life and helped persuade him to accept the Constitutional Convention’s unanimous nomination to serve as the first President of the United States. In final analysis, Shays’ Rebellion contributed to the establishment of a stronger federal government capable of providing for the economic, financial, and political needs of a growing nation.